UserTesting alternative

User testing for your store, every week, without recruiting a panel.

Tower's agents browse your store as your personas would and return every friction they meet — with the screenshot, the impact and a ticket ready for your sprint.

11/11 findings judged true by the store owner 65% → 90% coverage in two audits 0 real orders ever placed

What you give up with classic user testing

Platforms like UserTesting connect you with real people who complete tasks on your site while recording their screen and voice. That is valuable — real humans, real reactions. It also comes with a cycle: write the test, recruit or target participants, wait for sessions, watch the videos, then turn what you saw into tickets. On a store that changes every week, that cycle rarely keeps up.

Tower takes the opposite trade-off. AI agents browse your store as your personas, on a schedule, and hand you findings that are already written up: a screenshot, an observation with byte-exact quotes, a severity, an estimated conversion impact and a user story.

UserTesting vs. Tower at a glance

Human user testingTower
Who browsesReal participantsAI agents behaving as your personas
Setup per testWrite tasks, choose an audienceOnce: your store URL and your personas
OutputVideos and notes to reviewFindings with capture, severity and impact; user stories exportable to Linear
RhythmPer studyOn a schedule, deduplicated run to run
Best atEmotions, expectations, the "why" behind a choiceDefects and frictions along the buying journey, at every release

How Tower's "synthetic users" stay honest

AI personas are only useful if their findings are real. Three mechanisms hold Tower's to that:

  1. Proof is captured, not generated. Every finding ships with the screenshot of the page as served and quotes extracted byte-exact from it.
  2. Walking and judging are separate jobs. Walkers browse and judge nothing; analysts reread the walk and cannot return to the site; an evaluation judge screens findings before you see them.
  3. You have the last word. You judge each finding — actionable, false or noise — and your verdicts train the next run.

In the latest published pilot, the store owner judged 11 findings out of 11 true. One audit finds about 65% of a store's defects, two reach about 90%. We publish the misses too.

When to keep human testing

When you need to hear how a real customer feels about your brand, your pricing or a new concept, nothing replaces a person. Tower is built for the other job: making sure that, by the time you put a real person in front of your store, the broken search, the missing delivery time and the unexplained account wall are already fixed.

Start without a study plan

No panel to recruit, no script to write, nothing to install: agents read your public pages like any shopper, on any platform. Request your free first audit, see what it covers on the e-commerce UX audit page, or read the FAQ.

Run your first test on your store tonight.

First audit free. No panel, no scripts, no integration.